In law school you learn a lot about cases and decisions, but it all seems very abstract and theoretical. It's easy to forget that some of the major SupremeCourt rulings involved actual people fighting laws that had an actual effect on their lives and livelihoods.

This article caught my eye, because when I think of Lovingv.Virginia I think of conlaw, and fundamental rights, and the end of anti-miscegenation laws. But Mr. and Mrs.Loving were actual people, who just wanted to be married and live in Virginia.

Rest in peace Mrs.Loving!

MildredLoving, matriarch of interracial marriage, dies

By DIONNEWALKER, AssociatedPress Writer 36 minutes ago

MildredLoving, a black woman whose challenge to Virginia's ban on interracial marriage led to a landmark SupremeCourt ruling striking down such laws nationwide, has died, her daughter said Monday.

Pegg Fortune said Loving, 68, died Friday at her home in rural Milford. She did not disclose the cause of death.

"I want (people) to remember her as being strong and brave yet humble — and believed in love," Fortune told The Associated Press.

Loving and her white husband, Richard, changed history in 1967 when the U.S. SupremeCourt upheld their right to marry. The ruling struck down laws banning racially mixed marriages in at least 17 states.

"There can be no doubt that restricting the freedom to marry solely because of racial classifications violates the central meaning of the equal protection clause," the court ruled in a unanimous decision.

Her husband died in 1975. Shy and soft-spoken, Loving shunned publicity and in a rare interview with The AssociatedPress last June, insisted she never wanted to be a hero — just a bride.

"It wasn't my doing," Loving said. "It was God's work."

MildredJeter was 11 when she and 17-year-old Richard began courting, according to PhylNewbeck, a Vermont author who detailed the case in the 2004 book, "VirginiaHasn'tAlways BeenforLovers."

She became pregnant a few years later, she and Loving got married in Washington in 1958, when she was 18. Mildred told the AP she didn't realize it was illegal.

"I think my husband knew," Mildred said. "I think he thought (if) we were married, they couldn't bother us."

But they were arrested a few weeks after they returned toCentral Point, their hometown in rural CarolineCounty north of Richmond. They pleaded guilty to charges of "cohabiting as man and wife, against the peace and dignity of the Commonwealth," according to their indictments.

They avoided jail time by agreeing to leave Virginia — the only home they'd known — for 25 years. They moved to Washington for several years, then launched a legal challenge by writing to AttorneyGeneral RobertF.Kennedy, who referred the case to the AmericanCivilLibertiesUnion.

Attorneys later said the case came at the perfect time — just as lawmakers passed the CivilRightsAct, and as across the South, blacks were defying JimCrow's hold.

"The law that threatened the Lovings with a year in jail was a vestige of a hateful, discriminatory past that could not stand in the face of the Lovings' quiet dignity," said StevenShapiro, national legal director for the ACLU.

"We loved each other and got married," she told The WashingtonEveningStar in 1965, when the case was pending. "We are not marrying the state. The law should allow a person to marry anyone he wants."

After the SupremeCourt ruled, the couple returned to Virginia, where they lived with their children, Donald, Peggy and Sidney. Each June 12, the anniversary of the ruling, LovingDay events around the country mark the advances of mixed-race couples.

RichardLoving died in a car accident that also injured his wife. "They said I had to leave the state once, and I left with my wife," he told the Star in 1965. "If necessary, I will leave Virginia again with my wife, but I am not going to divorce her."